News Blog

Coronavirus as Disaster Epic

For most of my life I’ve been a fan of end-of-the-world movies, but now that the end times are surely upon us, the genre feels particularly apropos. Not that I especially want to watch them right now — these days, I’m preferring old musicals with cheery melodies and lots of tap dancing. But I’m glad I did watch the end of the world flicks when they came out. They’ve given me good preparation for global disasters of all kinds including asteroids, Planet X, aliens, nuclear wars, fascist pod people, smart computers, zombie epidemics, and generic apocalypses from A to Z.

Admittedly, coronavirus would probably make a pretty static end-of-the-world movie given that most of the participants are just locking themselves in their homes trying not to catch coronavirus. Nevertheless, if someone wanted to make a disaster film out of it, they could.

Read More

There’s Something Very Unifying About A Global Crisis

There’s something very unifying about a global crisis — a great inescapable event that affects us all at the same time.  Such crises seem rare but in modern times, they happen often.  We have world economic crises, a global climate crisis, and a crisis of faith in our leaders that’s led to widespread social uprisings around the world.  These sorts of crises affect everyone to some extent, but the effects are hard to gauge.  Some people are affected disproportionately, others not at all.

But in the case of coronavirus, it’s different.  Coronavirus is affecting everyone — rich and poor, young and old, all races and creeds — at the same time.  And while some of us say to ourselves, “It’s just the flu” or “I’m young, it won’t kill me,” our lives are still being majorly impacted by it.  For starters, there are social restrictions and they’re getting tighter by the hour.  Moreover, the world economy is shutting down, which means that along with toilet paper, money is going to be in short supply..

Read More

Dump The Dems

On Monday afternoon, on the eve of Super Tuesday, I voted for a Democrat for what will likely be the last time.  I was never a very strong Democrat, always to the left of party policy.  But in the past, I still believed that the Dems were at least marginally on the side of regular people.  I no longer believe that.  Today’s Democrats seem to be more interested in appealing to a better off clientele — people who really love their health insurance plans! and resent those who need help getting to sufficiency.

It wouldn’t be so bad if they had just sold out their values and left it at that.  They didn’t.  Instead, they went after their own frontrunner, Bernie Sanders, like he was Public Enemy #1.

Read More

The More They Differ, The More They Are The Same

Is it worse when a leader does openly what other leaders only do quietly or with more gravitas?  I think we would say yes to that and point to Donald Trump.  But are leaders who do bad things but obfuscate them necessarily better?

It makes me wonder if a lot of our problem with Trump is a matter of style.  He comes across like a cheap casino owner but acts like he’s the boss of everyone.  His manner, such as it is, offends many.  He does bad things and they seem worse because he admits that he does them and doesn’t even think they’re bad.  Then again, most presidents do bad things, or at least things that are later regarded to have been, and more often than not, we barely notice them.  Take immigration, for example.

When Trump is mean to immigrants at the border, he crows about it like it’s a good thing.  Obama was arguably mean to unaccompanied minors at the same border, but he made rational, measured statements about them, usually through spokespeople, so we gave him a pass.  Our beloved FDR imprisoned Japanese-Americans for the duration of World War II, but we forgive him that. 

Many other presidents have passed tax bills that favored the wealthy, but most impressively under Ronald Reagan and George Bush.  People aren’t big on Bush, because, for one thing, by the time he took office, Reagonomics had resulted in an economic downturn that was affecting everyone; Reagan, on the other hand, is revered.  

Border walls are bipartisan, or they were in the past.  Bush I started with a modest 14 miles of fencing, Clinton added a few miles as well, but it was George W. Bush who truly “built the wall.”  His legislation to construct 700 miles of barriers along the Mexico border passed by supermajorities in both the House and the Senate.  Bush succeeded in having 580 miles of wall built, before passing the project on to Obama, who got us up to just about 650 miles before calling the wall complete.

 Trade deals are bipartisan too. The corporation-friendly NAFTA trade deal was enacted under Clinton,  while Obama initiated the European and Pacific trade deals although neither was ratified. Now in comes Trump, and what does he do?  Does he throw out NAFTA, which he promised to eliminate and which lots of people hate?  No, he pretends to throw it out, and then he renegotiates it.  What’s in the new NAFTA?  Pretty much the same stuff that was in the old NAFTA, last tweaked under Obama.

As for foreign affairs, Trump hasn’t started any new unnecessary wars yet, unlike Reagan, Bush, Bush II, and Obama. On the other hand, he’s shown an unsavory interest in meddling in other countries internal affairs, particularly in South and Central America. This has posed no problem for him since American meddling in places like Venezuela has bipartisan support, as long as you can produce an evil dictator to castigate.  Is the story true?  Does it matter?  Only to the Venezuelans.

So far, Donald Trump has threatened a lot but compared to the massive harm he’s capable of doing, his major initiatives haven’t differed all that much from those of past presidents.   On the other hand, his style of doing them has been a thing to behold since he follows no accepted rules of protocol.

All that said, the scariest thing by far about Donald Trump is his appeal to fascist impulses in his supporters.  This is where he differs from just about every president we’ve ever had.  

Fascism is historically anti-Left, anti-immigrant, anti-globalist, strongly nationalist, united behind a strong male leader, and willing to use violence when deemed necessary.  Trump’s movement mirrors this description, making concerns about fascism realistic in his case.  All the precursors are there, including a susceptible subsection of the populace.

The chance that he could really pull off a Mussolini-style fascist take-over of America seems very unlikely, but there he is, and if you want to be sure, it would be better to vote him out of office.  Now, all the Democrats have to decide is who they hate more:  Donald Trump, proto fascist republican or Bernie Sanders, New Deal democratic socialist.  Let us hope they don’t choose “none of the above.”

Coronavirus, Fear, and Airborne Toxic Events

Coronavirus is a bit like the Airborne Toxic Event in DeLillo’s White Noise. It’s out there, it’s a threat, there’s nothing we can do about it, so it just lurks there in the back of our minds, occasionally reinforced by headlines and half-heard news broadcasts. Another thing that might get us.

The trouble is, there are so many of these things already, that if we let ourselves think about them, we might become hysterical. Coronavirus — a murky danger that could and likely will happen to at least some of us, eventually.

This is how the Terrible Twenties begin, ushering in a time of rumor and fear, as well as genuine peril…

The Big Problems Will Never Be Solved

Human beings have grand aspirations and great ideals but limited life spans. Every 100 years of so, all new people are on the planet. Each person born on Earth starts from scratch, knowing nothing of themselves or the world. More than any other species, human beings need to be taught how to be our species, or rather, how to be civilized versions of it. We invented civilization; we didn’t evolve it. But because it’s invented and not evolved, we have to teach it to our kids. Don’t eat with your fingers. Don’t hit your brother with a block. Take a bath and brush your teeth.

Read More

Today in Late October 2019

Inspired by the day’s world headlines:

spinning toward election
lawmakers reject proposal
fighters have left
forces captured
crisis turns violent
protesters pack square
so much damage
crisis despite slowdown
election blow
successor killed
dangerous situation
markets jumpy
police fire teargas
hopes resignation
won’t undermine stability

what do parties want to do?

police hunt for brothers
party appeals result
struggling to reform
rubble remains

hash cake accidentally served!
landslide kills dozens
wife held in london
child rapist released
racist abuse
amid protests
defy curfew
unfolding…

 

Special thanks to BBC and Reuters.

Keeping Up With Our Former Selves

People today aren’t so much keeping up with the Joneses as keeping up with our former selves. Things we used to be able to afford are suddenly too expensive. It’s not because we make less money nominally but that everything costs so much more. And so when commentators talk about people not getting a raise in 20 years, that’s what they’re talking about. The earning power of our money is less.

This doesn’t even get into the situation of people’s whose nominal income has been flat — or worse, has slid — but who are still forced to pay higher prices that assume a much higher income level. Read More

Corruption Battles

Watching multiple corrupt parties battling over corruption is a mindfuck that causes people to take this or that tidbit of the opposing stories and weave them into elaborate and unprovable theories designed to exonerate one or the other side, forgetting entirely that BOTH SIDES ARE CORRUPT, rendering the whole thing moot.

Bolton Makes Strange Bedfellows

The anti-war and anti-US-meddling wings of all parties should be very happy today.  John Bolton, the evil warmonger who has been Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor for the past year and a half has just exited the White House, stage right.  Trump fired him, says Trump.  I quit, says Bolton.  Who cares?  He’s gone and the world feels slightly less scary as a result.

In an effort to gauge public opinion on the matter, I read around the top news stories from papers across the country only to discover that views are mixed. Republican opinion is largely pro-Bolton, but oddly enough, some Democrats seem reluctant to admit that getting rid of Bolton is actually a very good thing.  They would have us to believe instead that Bolton’s departure is a symptom of how unstable our government is under Trump, rather than a lucky break for vulnerable peoples across the globe. Read More