News Blog

A Vocabulary of Fascism

Extremely anti-social views and behavior, coupled with a lack of conscience, are evidence that a person is suffering from sociopathy.  It’s hard to tell if someone actually lacks a conscience, but anti-social behavior is easy to spot.  People who habitually flout the laws and mores of their society, and who are, in fact, against those laws and mores, are behaving anti-socially. This may even be accompanied by misanthropy, which is the hatred of other people.

But just because you hate other people doesn’t mean you can’t love yourself. Narcissism is just that — excessive vanity and admiration of self.  And of course, egotism follows, for surely such a fabulous person as oneself will be completely selfish and self-absorbed. It’s the mindset of the spoiled rich kid — I want it, give it to me now!

Egotism leads to autocracy — the expectation of absolute power over other people, because after all — you’re great!  Not only do you deserve absolute power, you are the best and only person for the job.  And look how the people love you.  It’s proof that you deserve to run the world.

Every now and then, an autocrat emerges who takes it a step further — to the right, that is.  Suddenly, it’s all about the autocrat and his great nation which is his.  Everyone and everything must be put to the service of the great nation and its aims, which are the autocrat’s aims, which are never wrong and always right.

And now you have fascism, a totalitarian, rabidly nationalistic, far right system of government and society run by what we usually refer to as a “fascist dictator.”  Looking back into the not-so-distant past, we see that you don’t even have to be fully sane to do it.

If this is a problem for society, it will be solved. It’s only a matter of time.

 

Photo credit: Vrb7, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

Kids Say The Darnedest Things

Ever since Elon Musk started strutting around the White House like a third world dictator, people have been saying President Musk.  This was meant to get under Trump’s skin, but he hardly seemed to notice.  Musk did his standard derisive denial, and we were all supposed to forget about him, except when he calls press conferences in the Oval Office.  It was at just such a press conference, just days ago on the 11th of February, that none other than Musk’s son dropped a bombshell.  The adorable four year old turned to President Trump and said — near as anyone can tell — “You’re not the president — you need to leave.”

This would be Musk’s son “X,” who was named, tediously enough, for his father’s PR service Twitter, which he renamed X for reasons of his own.   The child was also heard to say, again to the President, “Shut your fucking mouth.”  Nice!

See: Did Elon Musk’s Son Say “You’re Not the President”? What He Said

Little X is one of at least 12 publicly acknowledged offspring Musk has brought into the world.  Why so many? No way to know since Musk’s reply seems typically disingenuous (he says he believes ‘intelligent people’ should produce offspring). Assuming none of the children are actual clones a la The Boys From Brazil, these are still seriously engineered children.  You could almost call them GMO kids. 

To begin with, all but the first of Musk’s children were conceived via In Vitro Fertilization.  According to Musk’s biography, Musk believes IVF is a more efficient way of having children because it allows parents to control the process. According to one blog, taking Musk’s bio as its source,  Musk used IVF with his twins by Shivon Zilis to ensure that the children would have his “genetic makeup.⁠1 We are left to ponder what that means.  There is also a tweet making the rounds, purportedly by yet another mother, Ashley St. Clair, which claims Musk used CRISPR and other genetic modification tools to create their 5 month old child, but the veracity of this post is in question.

According to Forbes⁠2, two of his first ten children were born male (an older child now named Vivian changed her sex).  The genders of his most recent offspring have not been revealed.  Who knows why Musk would want so many sons, although given what we know of his personality, it’s easy to guess.  Think of it, 13 little Elons running around, exercising their egos and using their vast fortunes to run the world.

Adding to the weirdness, People magazine told us last year⁠3 that Musk and Grimes (mother of Baby X and two others) were planning to build a compound somewhere on the west coast where Musk could live in peace and harmony with all the mothers and children, presumably while Musk indoctrinates them with his magnificent masculine aura…. Then again, this plan may be off now that Musk is running the world himself.

Ooh la la.  Is Musk building a dynasty?  If so, we could be dealing with “President Musk” for a very long time.

anImage_2.tiff

1 According to a story in How We Became A Family.

2 As reported by Forbes

3 All About Elon Musk’s 13 Children: All About the Tesla CEO’s Sons and Daughters (and the 4 Women He Shares Them With) 

Let’s Try To Save Democracy

Every day of the Trump dictatorship is a new revelation. Today, we learned that Trump’s people are intimidating citizens using law enforcement, the justice system, and local civil servants as their storm troopers.  They are planning to criminalize all forms of dissent.  So they say.  No doubt some people will be made examples of.  It’s terrifying, when you get right down to it.  But is it true?  Can Trump and Musk really shut down all dissent, just like that? Doubtful, but all the same, the pro-democracy, anti-fascist side seems shockingly inactive.  Social media tells us that there are a lot of people who want to fight back and stop the illegal, unconstitutional actions of Trump and his power-mad regime. So why aren’t we out there proving it?  Why this tepid, ho-hum response.   I’m going to attribute it to a lack of imagination about possible actions we can take.

To begin with, let’s talk short term goals — things we have to do right away to save ourselves from fascism.  At the top of that list is getting get rid of Elon Musk who is South African by birth and fascist by nature.  We’ll never get our democracy back as long as he’s around.  Next, we have to challenge the constitutionality of Trump’s massive barrage of presidential decrees.  This is an abuse of privilege if ever there was one.  We don’t govern the way in America — Trump’s executive orders need to be rolled back. 

What to do?  Here are some potential actions to add to the legal challenges currently underway.  

Since the White House is the seat of operations, a huge permanent rally needs to be there every day until Musk and Trump are gone.  If the police push back, the citizens push forward.  It may seem a bit like the myth of Sisyphus, but it’s vitally important that Musk and Trump feel physical pressure every day.  And that pressure has to be loud too.  The size of the rallies must grow and evolve until finally the Trump regime falls.  That’s one thing.  

Furthermore, these loud protests have to be localized in a thousand uncooperative ways, from saying no to some things to demanding others.  We and our elected representatives can do that.

For instance, states rights — demand them. That’ll give us a layer of protection from insane executive decrees.  Insist on state prerogative in every place it applies.  Treat federal money like the tainted apple it is and refuse to take any that has right-wing strings attached.  Don’t comply with Trumpian federal programs just to get money. 

While we’re being loud, we could also be contacting our Congresspeople and anyone else who’s got the power to help, just to keep them thinking and working on this problem, which is massive, an emergency if ever there was one. It’s not an “oh well, I guess we’re doing fascism now” kind of thing. This is all-hands-on-deck.    Seriously.  

So that’s where are are — the time of mourning is over, and we have got to get up off the sofa and do something.  Complete loss of freedom isn’t fun.  Having fascist overlords who use armed thugs to enforce their will is a new level of terrible.  If we don’t act now, we’re going to lose everything we care about, starting with the right to a decent life. Even though doing the right thing is hard, it’s better than suffering the eternal regret that comes with doing nothing.

Let’s try.  I will if you will…

 

Wcamp9, CC BY 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

There’s A New Doge In Town — And His Name Is Elon Musk

I’ve been reading a detective novel set in Venice, which, without mentioning the word itself, reminded me of the the Italian noun ‘doge.’ Why is it, I wondered, that it has such a fascist ring to it? For some reason, I get an Il Duce vibe every time I hear it, and I’ve been hearing it a lot lately. This is because Elon Musk, the South African multibillionaire who bought Trump the presidency, has declared himself Doge of the federal government.  I know, he’s not the actual Doge and that DOGE is just his cute name for his new fiefdom, but bear with me.  

For those out of the loop on Medieval titles, a doge is the absolute ruler of an Italian city-state such as Venice or Genoa.  In the day, the Doge was an elected office, but the term was life; the Doge’s job was to represent the local oligarchy.  Definitely a supreme leader type, to which Italy is prone. So this is what Musk is modeling himself after, and don’t think he doesn’t know it.  He even pronounces it the same.

It always seemed like such a typically European thing, these fascist leaders.  Not something we Americans would ever have to worry about.  After all, wasn’t it Sinclair Lewis who wrote It Can’t Happen Here?  And yet, here we are battling fascism in America — America, a beacon of democracy the world over.  I confess, I was surprised.  Lewis, however, would probably NOT be surprised to see America “go fascist.”  Unlike the rest of us, he knew it could happen here, and now, let’s face it, it has.

As for this Doge nonsense, Musk is all over it. Not only is it the name of this uber department which he’s created for himself, it’s also the name of his favorite cryptocurrency.  Using the government as the means to your own private jokes at the expense of the governed is sociopathic.  Using it to advertise a pet investment product, well, what can we say?  Dignity is not a virtue that Musk and Trump possess, if in fact they have any virtues at all. 

Elon Musk in his new role as Terminator of the American way of life now gets to put his patchy efficiency skills to the test in a complete, multi-billion dollar slash and burn on the federal government.  In the process, he will fire tens of thousands of federal employees and eliminate whole swathes of congressionally approved programs, without an iota of oversight or constitutional authority.  You know how tech bros love to disrupt.  Musk is here to disrupt the federal government, so that he and Trump can install a new bureaucracy with which to crush the American people into submission.  They’re thinking long term, you see.

It’s worth remembering that in every case of tech bro disruption, real people have suffered and lost their jobs, whole industries world-wide have been destroyed, whole communities as well, as the oligarchs gobble up our housing stock in the ongoing corporatization of real estate.  Future You will own nothing once they’re through.  The oligarchs will own it all and if we’re lucky, they’ll rent it back to us for a nominal fee, right down to the air we breathe.  

I don’t think it can be stressed enough that quality of life for all but the very wealthy is being destroyed, and the rich, especially the rich young disrupters of the tech industry, truly don’t care.  Why should they?  They’re getting what they want, which is everything and then some.

 But compared to other American oligarchs, Musk is in a league of his own.  Sure, he’s the richest guy in the galaxy but it goes way beyond that.  For starters, he makes no effort to hide his fascist views or his basic hatefulness.  Moreover, it’s hard not to think that he’s been having a laugh at the public’s expense, made all the more rich because so many of us still aren’t in on the joke.  The punch line, of course, is that he’s a fascist and he’s totally open about it, and people still think he’s great.  He can call new agency DOGE, he can sig heil at a Trump rally — twice! — and make Nazi jokes on X, and still people don’t call him on it.  If you’re him, it must be pretty hilarious.  

There’s an old flick called A Face In The Crowd which stars, of all people, Andy Griffith as a somewhat sociopathic populist hero who gets caught on a live mic making fun of his audience.  In the film, the duped American audience was not amused and they dropped him like a hot potato.  This was 1957, when people apparently still had values and some pride.  But today, Trump and his freak show cabinet are wide open about all their mean-spirited, undemocratic views, and still Trump’s supporters support them.  Congress approves or fails to condemn.  The media maintains Trump-friendly neutrality.  

In the end, you have to ask yourself, what would it take for Musk to fail?  Or Trump for that matter?  As The Last Poets said, in a song worth remembering in these dark and dangerous times, “Better get busy before we all are through….”

Photo Credit: Bundesarchiv, Bild 147-0510 / CC-BY-SA 3.0

The Perils of Political Ambivalence

America reels after Trump’s shocking election. What does it mean and what will the future bring?, people ask.

Half the people say: “It’s the end of the world! This will be Hell on Earth!”

And the other half say: “This is a glorious beginning. Soon we’ll have Heaven on Earth.”

I don’t believe either one. What to do?

Out here in the tiny bark of my ambivalent political opinions, I have been greatly buffeted by the much stronger and more forceful energies of those on either side. I am blasted from the left, frozen from the right, and rejected as wanting by both. Some think the path lies one way, some another; some think there’s no path at all.

First off, this last is false. There is always a path, even if you’ve been busted down to electrons. And since choosing between extremes, right or left, A or B, is impossible (because it leaves the entirety of the other side out), we need another way to choose.

Here’s an idea: imagine the American electorate as a Venn diagram. Now imagine that the best path lies between the extremes of A and B at the point where the two intersect.

In our competitive, winner-take-all society, politics is regarded as a battle, and the goal of government is to “push through” policy changes, regardless of how many or how few people actually want them. But perhaps this isn’t the role of a democratic government after all. For instance, what would happen if instead of enacting policies that half the country despises, we were to legislate only that on which we can agree? Would that be wrong? We’ll likely never know.

Meanwhile, pity the poor non-partisan, for truly they have nowhere to lay their head where it won’t get bashed by one of their politically-aligned fellows!

One Human Minute, or the Futuristic Essays of Stanislaw Lem

I enjoyed One Human Minute by Stanislaw Lem, but not excessively.  It’s written in Polish, translated into English, with just a slightly halting gait as a result.  And although the book is chock full of intriguing ideas, so is it with $5 words and concepts, making it a bit of a slog at times.  That said, it’s a thought provoking little book and not unreadable.

The title essay, “One Human Minute,” is Borgesian in that it is a review of a fictional — that is, non-existent— book, and hence is itself a work of fiction in non-fictional form.  As the title implies, the ‘book’ of the same title is an account, in actuarial style, of everything that happens on earth in one minute’s time.   It is quite horrific, according to Lem.  When you see man’s acts, collective, counted, and reported, they do not make a pretty picture.  But that isn’t even the point.  The real point is that people who can be identified and sorted into buckets by type, can also be predicted by those who do the sorting.

“Dostoevsky believed that we were threatened by scientifically proven determinism, which would toss the sovereignty of the individual—with its free will—onto the garbage heap when science was capable of predicting every decision and emotion like the movements of a mechanical switch.”

– Lem, “One Human Minute”, p. 19

According to Lem, Dostoevsky saw madness as the only avenue of escape, sort of like Jack Nicholson’s character in Catch 22.  

In fact, Lem thought 19th century determinism was dead, but unfortunately, he was wrong; that future is already here.  Big tech, and social media in particular, have used behavioral science (Pavlov’s dog) to both condition and predict our behavior.  We have no sovereignty, no personal freedom, we do and think as we’re told and enforce the same on our fellows.  It’s the modern, socially-required mode of life.  It seems so natural to us, we don’t even think to question it or know it’s there.  But it is and it has extinguished even the desire for free will.  Like the Little Green Men (LGMs) in Toy Story, we can’t function without the Unimind.  “The Claw!”

Back in Lem’s book, we move on to modern weapons systems in “The Upside Down Evolution.” Here Lem talks about smart and self-guided (even self-targeting) missiles and other weaponry that will dominate warfare in the present future until there’s no more point to having wars, or we destroy ourselves, whichever comes first.  Lem doesn’t actually say that but it appears to be the dominant subtext, although the matter-of-factness of his tone might cause you to think otherwise.

“…There is no way of testing a system designed to wage global nuclear war, a system made up of surface, submarine, air-launched, and satellite missiles, antimissiles, and multiple centers of command and communications, ready to loose gigantic destructive forces in wave on wave of reciprocal atomic strikes.”

– “The Upside Down Evolution,” p.44

Given the above conundrum, Lem’s future humans create a slew of slightly less deadly but still insidious weaponry — micro-weapons for instance, or search and destroy missiles that operate autonomously forever.  As he proceeds with his litany of horrible inventions, some of which probably exist  now, we are left with the impression, no doubt intended, that war is absurd, not to mention barbaric and wasteful, and there is no reason for intelligent people in a modern society to wage it.

In his final essay, “The World as Cataclysm,” Lem asserts that it is only through catastrophe that material progress is made.  From a naked arm of the Milky Way to our Solar System, and from dinosaurs to man, it took catastrophes in each case to bring on the transition.  In the case of our solar system, it was a rogue supernova, while in the case of Homo sapiens, it took a meteor the size of Cincinnati to kill off the dinosaurs and leave room for tiny mammals to evolve.

In other words, says Lem, “…the world is a group of random catastrophes governed by precise laws.”

In that this creative destruction is both catastrophic and random, there isn’t much more to say.  And so, given that it is two days after Election Day 2024, we will leave it at that.  Isn’t futurism fun?

 

Photo credit: Nick / from United Kingdom, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

DeLillo’s Great Jones Street Then and Now

When I opened up Great Jones Street, the 1973 novel by then barely known Don DeLillo, my first thought was, “This is going to be dated.” Naturally I was wrong.  Suffused with the gritty, absurdist ethos and aesthetics of punk rock combined with a noir-esque approach to dialogue and story development, DeLillo feels ahead of his time, not behind, and in a strange way, almost timeless.  The novel is the story of a rock star named Bucky Wunderlick, who one day walks out of his life as an international phenom and goes to live in a grubby apartment on Great Jones Street⁠1 in the East Village of New York City.  The reasons for this dereliction of duty are vague at first, but it seems to have something to do with fame.

“Fame requires every kind of excess,”  Wunderlick tells us in the opening sentence.  

The book is written in the first person from the point of view of Bucky.  He tells us about his famous life, so famous that when there is no news about him for more than a day or two, fans just make it up.  These inventions are then reported by the media as “rumored to be.”  As a musician, Wunderlick’s role is to alter the minds of his audience, to blast them into another dimension and fill their emptiness with the new thing, whatever it is.  It is always necessary that there be a new thing to give the fans the fresh stimulation they crave.  It becomes obvious after a while that the fans have no means to provide stimulation for themselves.

Wunderlick is in hiding, but not all that successfully.  People continually pay him visits.  His manager, the manager’s message boy, random druggies off the street, Opel the ex-girlfriend (one pictures a young Shelly Duvall).  There’s the writer upstairs, the mythical drug expert, Dr. Pepper, and representatives from the Happy Valley Commune and drug cartel.  A news team even stops in, but Bucky won’t talk to them, as he does with most of his visitors.  He’s not an outgoing guy, which is why it’s actually a good thing that all these people come to call.  Otherwise, the novel would consist of Wunderlick sitting  silently in a chair, Wunderlick staring out the window, Wunderlick talking to himself.  And even with all the visitors, there’s still a fair amount of Wunderlick talking to himself.

This too is ok — Wunderlick is a post-modern character (which means literally that he is “post-Now” if that means anything—he’s in the future, man). And as a man of the future, he is obsessed with nothing except the fervent desire to escape the sick emptiness of the modern world, a world so empty that it needs famous avatars like Wunderlick to give it life and meaning, something the fans cannot generate for themselves, something the fans will pay to get.  As his manager Globke points out, it doesn’t matter what he does as long as he does something — something that can be commodified and sold.

“I believe in death-in-life,” said Hanes.

Everyone in DeLillo’s novel talks like a character in a Raymond Chandler novel, if they were, at the same time, part-time philosophers and marketing genii.  Which, in a way, they are.

“The tour represents a survival all its own, Bucky, and I know you perceive that truth.  They’re waiting out there… It’s America.  The whole big thing. Popcorn and killer drugs.  You can’t just sit here.”  Says Globke. 

Globke is Wunderlick’s manager.  He and Hanes work for Transparanoia, Wunderlick’s rock star holding company.  It exists solely to use up the cash generated by the rock star and his band, making Bucky the owner and chief exploitee.  The corporation needs one thing above all else — cash flow.  Why?  So it can keep on doing whatever it’s doing, even if that mission is unknown even to its owner.  Only Globke knows all.  Never mind that modernity is nothing but darkness cloaked in glitz and banality.  It sells, or it can sell, and that’s all that matters.

As types, DeLillo’s characters exist to sketch an outline and convey information that our hero and the reader need to know.  Our hero is a philosopher.  He thinks about things. Oddly enough, most of his many visitors are also philosophers — his ex-girlfriend, the Transparanoia lackey, the freelance writer upstairs.  They can render advice, tell him how the world works, warn him of consequences.

Speaking of the world, it is not a pretty one, the world of Great Jones Street.  The apartment is kept in the condition of a junkie’s flop, although our hero does no drugs. Nothing works except the telephone; there’s no coffee, no food, only a grim view out the window, a bubble chair, and a bed.  That’s why it almost makes sense that he is chosen by the shadowy drug people who meander through this novel as the perfect person to leave their brick of experimental drugs with. 

If we were comparing: the novel is a satire but not like Candide, a philosophical novel but not like Dostoevsky, a noir private detective novel without the detective.  Our hero is uninterested in anything anyone says to him, and we’re unsure if we should be either, although we are.   

Enveloping the novel like a cold fog,  there’s a gritty sci-fi ambience reminiscent of Bladerunner/Philip K. Dick.  But in the end, it’s really a twisted amalgamation of all these things, and also an excuse to talk about fame and privacy, pop culture and its effect on people, people and their desire to be dictated to by pop culture, creativity and language and their increasing irrelevance, in short, the death of the artist, who does not die but may as well have.

And that is far from all that one could say about Great Jones Street by Don DeLillo.  Read it and it will haunt you in strange ways, like an unsettling dream about real life as played by characters from a Raymond Chandler novel on existential dope.

_+_

anImage_2.tiff

1 A street in No-Ho, Manhattan.  The area of 3rd St. between Broadway and the Bowery. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Jones_Street

Photo credit: Beyond My Ken, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

Unscheduled Bliss

I had just gotten dressed and was preparing to go downstairs for toast and coffee when the power went out.  Oops, there went my morning plan for breakfast and work. Feeling unhinged from the surprise disruption, I initiated a drive to the local farm stand where we bought coffee and some kind of scone.  This helped considerably.

Sitting in the car watching the play of light on the flowers and vegetables outside, it suddenly occurred to me how beautiful it all was, and how I wouldn’t be having this midweek morning bliss if the power hadn’t gone out.  Inconvenient as such things are, it’s hard to turn down unscheduled bliss.  

The coffee wasn’t bad either. 

 

Photo credit: Rick Obst from Eugene, United States, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

Memos to Self

Recently, I cleared out my pockets for pieces of paper scribbled on by me, and sorted through them with the intention of removing intellectual clutter from my life.  What was so important, I wondered, about these thoughts, that I wrote them down and carried them around, possibly for weeks, even after I could no longer remember what any of them were.  So I pulled them out and read them — a mixed bag of random pensées*, of no particular importance except perhaps to record what I was thinking about in the month of June 2024.  

“Language and thought—a country needs to speak the same language to have unity.”

My thinking here was that if the language we speak reflects how we think, and how we think reflects who we are as a people, then a country in which people speak one or several different languages without sharing any one language in common is going to have trouble getting along.  This failure to get along arises from our inability to understand each other in the most literal sense—what you say to me sounds like gibberish, and vice versa.  If you expand this to the figurative sense, forget about it.  We’re lost.

“Is it propaganda if it’s true?”

Modern people are much more savvy to the idea of propaganda than we used to be.  Maybe the Internet opened our eyes.  But what if a known source of propaganda puts out a story designed to support a particular viewpoint, and let’s say also that the story turns out to be true.  Is it still propaganda?  I’m going to say yes, because propaganda is at least partially defined by intent.  If the intention is to deceive or manipulate, then it’s propaganda, pure and simple.  Its trueness doesn’t change the fact that the wielder of the story did so with dishonest intent. Nor however does the fact that it’s propaganda make it false.  This is an important distinction.

“Geopolitically speaking, all the places where we got the borders wrong are going to get fixed.”

Around the world, European powers have redrawn borders and created nations, often with little regard for the custom or desires of the local inhabitants.  Eastern Europe has a particularly rich history of shifting borders, first as the long borderland between Russia and Europe, later as individual territories under the various empires that once ruled that part of the world.  They’ve undergone a great many changes over the centuries, so many that one wonders if a region so much in contest and in flux can ever be stable.  

Nevertheless, there are borders that are still being fixed to this day.  This is not going to stop happening until all the people who speak the same languages live in the same countries.  See “language and thought” above.

“America’s goal is global hegemony.  It accomplishes this goal by means of regime change.  The name of this game is ‘Let’s You and Him Fight**.’”

America’s method of obtaining regime change is by proxy, or to put it another way, by provoking war between America’s target and a convenient antagonist willing to fight a war in America’s stead.   And while this methodology doesn’t produce much in the way of stable democracies, it’s ace at achieving regime change, which is really all we care about — as long as a “friendly” government is installed in its place. 

“Good people are obliged to show they care; worrying is an obligation.”

I don’t agree with this position.  It’s a huge waste of emotional energy and accomplishes nothing. But from a social standpoint, it’s considered bad form not to worry about the things that others worry about.  And so we wrap ourselves in worry in order to fit in.

“If nothing matters, then there’s nothing to worry about.”

This is true, but most good people won’t agree that nothing matters. In fact, we’re expected to believe that everything matters greatly, which necessitates worry.  See above.

“Express yourself through writing.  Write for the future.”

Once interpersonal communication becomes impossible, you have only one resort if you need to express your thoughts — and let’s face it, we all need to express ourselves from time to time.  That last resort is writing.  As for your intended audience, it’s clearly not your contemporaries.  They wouldn’t understand, and for all you know, you might be tossed into a dungeon somewhere for expressing unsanctioned views.  Your audience is now limited to either yourself or some future reader who isn’t obsessed with who’s going to win the presidency. You are nevertheless assisted by the fact that having no living audience to please, you can say whatever you want — provided it’s true to you.  You may feel lonely writing anonymously for no one, but remember that Voltaire spent the better part of his life in exile, and we still remember him today.  (He did not give up writing or society, however.  Maybe Voltaire is a bad example…)

That’s it for the latest crop of notes. I’m now able to throw out a half dozen small sheets of paper and the semi-cryptic notes they contain, while the thoughts themselves are preserved and extended, if not into eternity, at least for the near future, which is ample for my purposes. As for the one sheet of notes I did not include, it was a rambling two paragraphs on AI, the topic de jour for sure. Not that it matters.  I’ll have plenty of time to think about that in the future, although by then, AI will no doubt have rendered thinking obsolete. 

* One of the sheets of paper contains a sketched arrangement of three pansies, under which is written the word, Pansies. I hereby dedicate it to André Breton.

** “Let’s You And Him Fight” is actually one of the “games people play” from the 1964 book of the same name by psychiatrist Eric Berne. Giving snappy names to his games is part of the reason the book was so popular.

Can’t We Just Get Along? A Lesson the Past

One of the more fascinating personages of times past was Henry of Navarre, a ne’er-do-well and free thinker who became king of the French during the religious wars of the 1500s.  It was right after the Reformation, and society was rather tense, as seemed always to be the case when religious reformation broke out. The Protestants hated the Catholics. The Catholics hated the Protestants.  This was nothing new, but in France, the hatred was so intense that people killed each other by the thousands for over 30 years.

It should be noted that, religion aside, everyone involved was French, everyone spoke the French language, everyone ate baguettes, but if you believed in the wrong number of sacraments or had ornaments in your churches, you were bad, pure and simple — so bad, in fact, that you needed to be tortured and killed.

Henry of Navarre was a Protestant. For a while, then he became a Catholic.  For another while, then he got excommunicated twice and became a Protestant again.  And finally, just to put the proverbial icing on the cake, he converted back to Catholicism.  He called his last conversion a small price to pay to keep Catholic Paris happy in the new tolerant France that he intended to govern.

All this was accomplished, albeit slowly, through the enacting of the Treaty of Nantes, which flawed though it was, did permit Protestants some degree of religious freedom in France.  With this feat, decades of assault and battery, murder and bloodshed, came more or less to an end. And while the former combatants never got to peaceful coexistence, they were able to manage in a segregated fashion which was as good as could be expected in 16th century France.

There may be ideas worth dying for, but Henry didn’t think religion was one of them.  Which is why it’s rather ironic that he met his end at the hands of someone who did.  In 1610, some dozen years after establishing peace in the realm, he was fatally stabbed by a Catholic monk who was angry with Henry for not being sufficiently intolerant of Huguenots.

And so it goes.  More than 400 years later, our mutual hatred is just as great, although now it’s for political rather than purely religious reasons.  If there is any lesson to be learned it is this: beware of ideology.  It can never be appeased.

Image credit:  Jacob Bunel, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons